gnosticeden There's a popular misconception that early Christianity was a unified group under the Church of Rome and the banner of Peter as "Pope Peter I". How do such misconceptions arise?

We can never know for sure, but we'll just have to do with the Church of Rome's centuries of persecution and extermination of heretics, massive and efficient book-burning campaigns and an active attempt to rewrite history.

In reality, there was a different version of Christianity available on every street corner through the first few centuries after the death of Jesus Christ. Among these, the Gnostics were in many ways the most radical and the most influential.

Unlike its Roman competitor, Gnosticism was by no means a monolithic and inviolable set of beliefs. The root of the word "gnostic" is the Greek term "gnosis," which means "knowledge." The Gnostics believed they were the owners of secret information about how things really are. The actual content of that information dramatically differed based on who you asked.

The Gnostic tradition actually predates Christianity by at least a century. During the period just before and after the birth of Christ, Judaism had become severely fragmented, and various sects competed for popular and theological support. Much of this activity was driven by the Roman Empire's conquest of Jerusalem around 60 B.C., which sent many Jews into paroxysms of apocalism. Many were eagerly awaiting the arrival of the messiah, who was most often imagined as a general or king who would liberate the Holy City (again).

The Gnostics began as a very esoteric sects of Judaism, but quickly assimilated Christian beliefs with such enthusiasm that the two became largely indistinguishable. The core set of beliefs held by the Gnostics included one or more of the following tenets (mixing and matching from the list was encouraged):

  • The world was created by an Evil God (usually identified as the Old Testament God) who was acting without proper authorization from the Good God, who was the secret and true God.
  • The material world, for either the reason above or some other reason, is therefore inherently evil and flawed.
  • jesus1
  • Adam and Eve were thrown out of the Garden of Eden by the Evil God for the "sin" of seeking knowledge (gnosis, get it?), thereby rendering the serpent into a heroic figure.
  • The Evil God is a male figure, sometimes referred to as Samael, which means "blind God," or Yaldabaoth, which means "born of chaos" or some such thing. The Good God was often depicted as a mother goddess named Sophia, which means "wisdom."
  • Jesus was an emissary of the Good God (or Goddess), who was sent to Earth to impart secret knowledge to the chosen few.
  • All that stuff in the New Testament is just the mass market version of what Christianity was supposed to be, while the Gnostics possessed the special edition DVD of Christianity with lots of bonus features, including secret teachings which were denied to the unworthy.
  • Jesus didn't die on the cross, but rather only created the illusion he was being crucified. Some Gnostic versions of the Passion story have Jesus magically switching places with Simon of Cyrene (who in the New Testament mercifully carries the cross a few blocks to give Jesus a break). Jesus then stands off to the side laughing his ass off while Simon is crucified in his place. (And remember, this is the emissary of the GOOD God.)
  • The Gnostics had widely divergent views on sex. Most Gnostics believed the body was made from inferior matter and thus utterly unimportant in the scheme of things. This naturally leads to one of two extreme viewpoints. 1) It's best to entirely eschew all pleasures of the sinful flesh, so one must never have any sex at all, or 2) Since the flesh is completely worthless, it's completely irrelevant what you do with it, so fuck all you like. As the Shakers would later discover, the first approach has the unfortunate effect of causing your religion to pretty much die out in the first generation, which is why you tend to hear more about the second approach.
The Gnostics didn't believe in the whole "apostolic succession" concept that led to the creation of the papacy, which made them primo targets for the burgeoning Roman Catholic church. The Roman church denounced Gnosticism as heresy on the premise that it denied the reality of the Crucifixion, but really they were more pissed about the pope thing. Gnostics opposed any sort of central authority and believed that revelation came only from God.

gnosticinquisition Naturally, the Roman church decided the best way to resolve these differences was to kill all the Gnostics and burn all their books. This took a while, but they did a really thorough job. With the extermination of the Cathars and the Knights Templar by the Inquisition in the 13th century, the last vestiges of Gnosticism were eradicated... or so it seemed.

There were traces of gnosticism scattered through the Christian bible (specifically the Gospel and letters attributed to the apostle John, as well as the Book of Revelations). But the real survivals of the religion came in three distinct branches.

The weirdest, but least influential, surviving Gnostics were the Mandeans, a ascetic sect of between 30,000 and 60,000, located along the border between Iran and Iraq. The Mandeans believe there is a world of light to the North and darkness to the South, and the two are engaged in war. Other than that, they seem to follow generally Gnostic lines, although they hold some secrets to themselves.

gnosticmatrix2 The second survival of Gnosticism came through secret societies, which purport to carry on Gnostic traditions through various means. Freemasonry is thought to be influenced by the Gnostics, as were the Knights Templar, who were based in the same French territory where the Cathars lived. Various groups claim the Knights Templar as part of their lineage, including the Illuminati and the Ordo Templi Orientis. The latter organization overtly identifies itself with Gnosticism, and one of its major rituals is the Gnostic Mass, written by Aleister Crowley.

The third survival of Gnosticism is a weird historical oddity. In 1945, a collection of ancient texts were found at the site of Nag Hammadi, Egypt. They had been sealed in jars and buried by an small sect which had a monastery on the site, then forgotten. Because they had been so thoroughly concealed, they escaped the vast book-burning campaign of the early Catholic church. The discovery of the texts provided the first legitimate record of the Gnostics; previously most historical information about Gnosticism was extracted from published church tracts attacking their beliefs.

The Gnostic scriptures provided a lot of insight into the development of early Christianity, as well as providing textual clues to the origins of the New Testament gospels, which may have been plagarized in part from the Gnostic originals.

Gnosticism has become somewhat en vogue in recent years. The underlying theme of the "world as illusory prison" has provided fodder for many modern auteurs, including notably sci-fi giant Philip K Dick, Grant Morrison, author of The Invisibles, and the Wachovski Brothers, creators of The Matrix.

So when the next Inquisition comes, rest assured that Keanu Reeves will be the first one up against the wall.

Contact Us

Your feedbacks and suggestions to improve this site are highly appreciated!